Why Ukraine's '18–24' Contract Soldiers Face Immediate Re-mobilization After Discharge.

Contractors mobilization after demobilization
Contractors mobilization after demobilization

No Legal Protection for Demobilized Soldiers

According to TSN.ua: Ukraine currently lacks any legal provision granting a deferment from further service to soldiers who signed the '18–24' contract. This legislative gap means these troops could be called up again immediately after their demobilization. Roman Kostenko, Secretary of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security, Defense, and Intelligence, confirmed that a draft law proposing a one-year deferral for this category of contract soldiers failed to gain support from lawmakers. This situation is particularly challenging as the country continues to rely heavily on its mobilized forces for national defense.

As it stands, soldiers who served under the '18–24' contract remain without the promised right to a year-long break from service. Roman Kostenko stressed that the prospect of a person being immediately re-mobilized after discharge is unacceptable. He emphasized the urgent need to legislate on this issue, stating:

“This must be enshrined in law; it is our obligation, we promised it.”

Extended Martial Law and Its Implications

Ukraine is preparing for the 18th extension of martial law and general mobilization. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has submitted the relevant decrees to the Verkhovna Rada to extend these measures for another 90 days, until May 4 of this year. Consequently, the issue of deferment for '18–24' contract soldiers remains critically relevant against the backdrop of ongoing hostilities and continued mobilization efforts. The repeated extensions highlight the protracted nature of the conflict.

The deferment predicament for these contract servicemembers underscores the broader necessity for clear legislative regulation concerning mobilization and servicemembers' rights. The absence of a proper legal framework risks causing significant social discontent among veterans, which could negatively impact military morale and the willingness to serve. The ongoing state of martial law further points to the critical need for strengthened legislation in this area to ensure stability and sustained support for the armed forces.


Read also

Advertising