Ukraine between Mujahideenization and Polonization.

Ukraine: the choice between "Mujahideenization" and "Polonization"

The conflict in Ukraine can be compared to the initial phase of World War III, as each opposing side is backed by a coalition. Without Western assistance, Ukraine would be waging a guerrilla war, and Russia could not conduct such an intensive war without its allies. Quoting the author, "we are attacked not only with Soviet-Russian weapons but also with Chinese electronics, Iranian shaheeds, and North Korean shells and missiles."

The Ukrainian authorities are making efforts for the West to join the war on Ukraine's side. This strategy is similar to Churchill's strategy, who understood that the key to victory was America's entry into the war. However, by involving allies in the war, we risk contradicting their strategic logic, which calls for avoiding a nuclear confrontation at all costs. Thus, we must build our future strategy, understanding that we should support Ukraine and prevent its defeat, but not wage a direct war on its side.

We face two options: "Mujahideenization" of Ukraine or "Polonization." The first option involves continuing the war until punishing Putin, but it may lead to the country's destruction and a large number of casualties. The second option is a radical restructuring of the state, which will ensure peace and development. The future of Ukraine depends on all these aspects, and the best option would be strengthening the country through reforms and development.