US Intelligence Denies Assassination Attempt on Putin: What We Know About the Attack on His Residence.

According to ТСН: The American intelligence community has denied Russian claims of an alleged attempt on President Vladimir Putin and his residence. According to Western media, assessments from US intelligence services found no evidence that Ukraine or other forces attempted to attack the personal residences of the Russian president.

US Intelligence Data

According to American officials, the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency found no evidence linking the strikes that the Russian side attempted to associate with the 'attack on Putin' to his personal residences or places where he might be. The Wall Street Journal notes that these strikes were aimed at military targets in the region.

Information Campaign

American sources also emphasize that Russian claims may be part of a large-scale information campaign aimed at creating tension surrounding the security of Russian leadership and influencing international political processes.

The President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky earlier characterized the Russian accusations as fake.

Doubts in the US

Meanwhile, the truthfulness of the Russian version of events is being questioned in the US. In particular, President Donald Trump has previously cited materials that challenge the Kremlin's statements regarding the 'assassination attempt'.

Kremlin's Position

The publication Le Monde reported that, according to a source close to French President Emmanuel Macron, Putin has no evidence to support the alleged 'drone attack' by Ukraine on his residence actually took place. An unnamed source noted that the Kremlin's position contradicts itself regarding what actually happened.

Additionally, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declined to answer questions about where 'Fuhrer' Putin was during the 'attack' on his residence, stating that 'this topic is not open for public discussion.'

Thus, the situation surrounding the claims from the Russian side continues to raise doubts among Western experts, who believe that this information may be part of a larger propaganda strategy. It is important to follow further statements from both sides, as during conflicts, such communications can significantly influence international relations and public opinion.