Why Russia's Aggression Must Not Be Rewarded: The US and Ukraine's Stance on Peace.

19.01.2026 374

19.01.2026 374

Peace talks between Ukraine and Russia

The US and Ukraine's Position on the Peace Process

According to UATV: The United States and Ukraine have articulated a firm stance regarding peace negotiations with Russia, emphasizing that acts of aggression must not be met with concessions. Senator Lindsey Graham stated that

"Russian aggression should not end with it being rewarded,"

highlighting the need to avoid compromises that could encourage further belligerence. For his part, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy affirmed that

"Ukraine has never been and never will be an obstacle to peace,"

stressing that delays in signing peace agreements are directly linked to Russia's actions. This shared perspective underscores a core principle of international law and security.

Escalation on the Front Lines

The situation on the battlefield intensified following a meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago on December 28, 2025. In the 18-day period from December 28, 2025, to January 15, 2026, Russia launched a massive barrage of attacks against Ukraine, including:

nearly 2,500 guided aerial bombs,
more than 3,500 attack drones,
60 ballistic missiles,
32 cruise missiles.

As noted by Petr Pavel, these actions represent a clear attempt 'to undermine the Ukrainians' capacity for defense.' The scale of this assault demonstrates the ongoing severity of the conflict.

Consequently, the position of the US and Ukraine remains unchanged: a genuine peace process is only possible if the aggressor gains no rewards for its actions. The ongoing military pressure from Russia, despite calls for diplomacy, keeps the situation in eastern Ukraine highly volatile. This enduring crisis highlights the critical need for sustained international support and unity in upholding Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, a matter of profound significance for European and global security.