Demolition Begins on Odesa’s Historic Winery Building – What’s Behind the Destruction.

Odesa Landmark Under Demolition

According to Novyny.live: On March 23, 2023, heavy machinery began dismantling part of a locally recognized architectural landmark at 10 French Boulevard in Odesa. The site is part of the former Winery No. 1, sparking alarm among residents and city officials. This historic structure, designed by architect Lev Vlodek in 1895, has stood for over a century.

The following day, March 24, 2023, a commission comprising municipal services and the military administration conducted an on-site inspection. The investigation was prompted by the complete absence of permits for the work, raising serious questions about its legality. According to Oleksandr Avdeyev,

“damage to the architectural monument has been confirmed. This building is officially designated as a local architectural and urban planning landmark.”

Building’s History and Public Reaction

This property, privately owned by the company 'KAPLOR 7,' sits on land leased through 2039. Previous attempts to damage the site occurred in August 2025 at the 'Odesavynprom' factory grounds. The current demolition has ignited widespread public concern and official scrutiny.

Hennadiy Chekita emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating:

“If this is illegal destruction, those responsible must face criminal charges.”

His remarks highlight the potential legal consequences for parties involved in unauthorized demolition. Local authorities are now closely monitoring the case, which could set a precedent for protecting cultural heritage in the region and holding private owners accountable. The incident underscores ongoing tensions between development pressures and preservation of Odesa’s architectural identity.

The unauthorized demolition of a protected landmark in Odesa has triggered a broad response from both the public and government officials, fueling debate over the legality of such actions. Architectural monuments are not only cultural treasures but also vital to the city’s historical identity. The outcome of this case may significantly influence heritage protection policies and the liability of private property owners in the future.