Bernadette Hayes Awarded £23,526 in Landmark Tribunal Case Over Ethnic Slurs.

Bernadette Geiss won court case
Bernadette Geiss won court case

Tribunal Rules in Favor of Bernadette Hayes

According to TSN.ua: An employment tribunal has ruled in favor of Bernadette Hayes, who took legal action against her manager, Mick Atkins, for subjecting her to a pattern of ethnic harassment. The tribunal found Atkins, a director at West Leeds Civils, guilty of unwanted conduct and ordered him to pay compensation totaling £23,526. This ruling followed a lengthy process that established Atkins repeatedly used offensive slurs against Hayes, including shouting the word 'potato' and other derogatory terms targeting Irish people.

Case Details and Compensation Breakdown

Bernadette Hayes had worked at West Leeds Civils for two years before the abusive comments began. During the proceedings, the tribunal determined that the allegations which led to her dismissal in August 2024 were 'completely unfounded.' It further concluded she was a victim of 'unwanted conduct.' The awarded compensation of £23,526 (approximately 1,392,000 Ukrainian Hryvnia) was comprised of:

  • £13,000 for injury to feelings
  • £6,104 for loss of earnings
Bernadette Hayes: 'I felt trapped.'

In his remarks, Judge Buckley noted that 'when considered cumulatively, it is readily understandable that a person of Irish heritage would find the repeated use of words such as 'potato', 'paddy', 'stupid paddy' and 'pikey' offensive and demeaning.' This case sets a significant precedent in the UK for combating workplace discrimination and underscores the importance of protecting employee rights. Such rulings highlight the ongoing legal and social challenges in creating inclusive work environments.

The verdict not only addresses this specific instance of discrimination but also stresses the critical need for safe workplaces for all employees. Decisions like this can encourage other companies to review their HR policies and implement training programs aimed at reducing discrimination and harassment. This case arrives amidst a broader global conversation on human rights and equality, making its implications relevant for both business and society.


Read also

Advertising